Greek fragility hip fracture registry 2025 annual report
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69133/aoth.v77i2.533Keywords:
Hip fracture; fragility fractures; osteoporosis; clinical registry; Greece; geriatric trauma; quality of care; national registryAbstract
The Greek Fragility Hip Fracture Registry continued its expansion in 2025, its third year of operation, with five additional orthopaedic departments joining the initiative and increasing the number of active centres to thirteen. During the year, data from 2046 patients were recorded, raising the total number of cases in the registry to 4228. The mean patient age was approximately 83 years and the majority were female (71.2%). Most patients lived independently prior to injury and had preserved cognitive function. Intertrochanteric fractures were the most common fracture type (50.7%), followed by displaced intracapsular fractures (34.4%). Operative treatment was performed in most cases, predominantly using intramedullary nailing or hip hemiarthroplasty, although only 35.2% of patients underwent surgery within the recommended 48-hour from admission timeframe. The mean length of hospital stay in 2025 was 9.1 days, slightly reduced compared with the previous year, and in-hospital mortality was 3.2%. Most patients were mobilized on the first postoperative day and were discharged home, while approximately one quarter were transferred to rehabilitation facilities. However, documentation of secondary fracture prevention remained limited, with only 21.2% of patients discharged with recorded anti-osteoporotic treatment. Thirty-day mortality was 11.2%, showing improvement compared with 2024. Overall, the registry continues to provide important national data on fragility hip fracture care and highlights areas requiring further improvement, particularly timely surgery and secondary fracture prevention.
Downloads
References
1. Yeritsyan D, Momenzadeh K, Mohamadi A, Mortensen SJ, Beeram IR, Caro D, et al. Sociodemographic and Lifestyle Risk Factors Associated with Fragility Hip Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Vol. 4, Osteology. 2024. p. 64–87.
2. Jozefowski N, Eikani C, Lingampalli N, Lawler P, Barrett A, Hoyt A, et al. The Impact of National Orthopaedic Fracture Registries: A Systematic Review. OTA Int [Internet]. 2025;8(1).
3. Babagoli M, Ghaseminejad Raeini A, Sheykhvatan M, Baghdadi S, Shafiei SH. Influencing factors on morbidity and mortality in intertrochanteric fractures. Sci Rep [Internet]. 2023;13(1):12090.
4. Griffin XL, Achten J, Parsons N, Costa ML, collaborators Wh. Does performance-based remuneration improve outcomes in the treatment of hip fracture? RESULTS FROM THE WHITE MULTICENTRE HIP FRACTURE COHORT. Bone Joint J. 2021;103(5):881–7.
5. Iliopoulos E, Tosounidis T, Moustafa RM, Tilkidis F, Daskalakis I, Melissaridou D, et al. The use of minimum common data set in the development of the Greek Fragility Hip Fracture Registry in the Greek health care setting: the first year of its pilot implementation. Arch Osteoporos [Internet]. 2024;19(1):85.
6. Griffin XL, Achten J, Parsons N, Costa ML. Does performance- based remuneration improve outcomes in the treatment of hip fracture ? 2017;881–7.
7. Patel NK, Sarraf KM, Joseph S, Lee C, Middleton FR. Implementing the National Hip Fracture Database: an audit of care. Injury. 2013;44(12):1934–9.
8. Hallen J, Close J, Harvey L, Jin X, Fleming S, Wall C. Australian and New Zealand Hip Fracture Registry (ANZHFR) Annual Report 2025.
9. Ellanti P, Cushen B, Galbraith A, Brent L, Hurson C, Ahern E. Improving hip fracture care in Ireland: a preliminary report of the Irish hip fracture database. J Osteoporos. 2014;2014(1):656357.
10. Werner M, Macke C, Gogol M, Krettek C, Liodakis E. Differences in hip fracture care in Europe: a systematic review of recent annual reports of hip fracture registries. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg [Internet]. 2022;48(3):1625–38.
11. Ojeda-Thies C, Sáez-López P, Currie CT, Tarazona-Santalbina FJ, Alarcón T, Muñoz-Pascual A, et al. Spanish National Hip Fracture Registry (RNFC): analysis of its first annual report and international comparison with other established registries. Osteoporos Int. 2019;30:1243–54.
12. Huette P, Abou-Arab O, Djebara AE, Terrasi B, Beyls C, Guinot PG, et al. Risk factors and mortality of patients undergoing hip fracture surgery: a one-year follow-up study. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):9607.
13. Sasabuchi Y, Matsui H, Lefor AK, Fushimi K, Yasunaga H. Timing of surgery for hip fractures in the elderly : A retrospective cohort. Injury [Internet]. 2018;49(10):1848–54.
14. Li X, Gong X, He L, Wu X. Current surgical status of hip fracture among elderly in China. Injury [Internet]. 2024;55(2):111083.
15. Morrissey N, Iliopoulos E, Osmani AW, Newman K. Neck of femur fractures in the elderly: Does every hour to surgery count? Injury. 2017;48(6).
16. Iliopoulos E, Tosounidis T, Moustafa RM, Charmpi A, Tilkidis F, Daskalakis I, et al. Greek fragility hip fracture registry 2024 annual report. Acta Orthop Traumatol Hell. 2025;76(1).
17. Makras P, Babis GC, Chronopoulos E, Karachalios T, Kazakos K, Paridis D, et al. Experience gained from the implementation of the fracture liaison service in Greece. Arch Osteoporos. 2020;15:1–8.
18. Makras P, Panagoulia M, Mari A, Rizou S, Lyritis GP. Evaluation of the first fracture liaison service in the Greek healthcare setting. Arch Osteoporos. 2017;12:1–6.
19. Altsitzioglou Pavlos; Mavrogenis Andreas; Makras Polyzois. Fracture Liaison Services (FLS): a Review. acta Orthop Traumatol Hell. 2025;74(2):6–15.
20. Iliopoulos E, Drosos G. Can a fracture liaison service (FLS) be successfully established in Greece? acta Orthop Traumatol Hell. 2025;76(1):1–2.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Acta Orthopaedica Et Traumatologica Hellenica

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.